Origins of First World War

there are many origins of the First origination state of war. For this essay I will cover just two or terzetto of them. An eventful factor leading up to the First World War was the assassination of the Archduke Franz Ferdinand. The archduke and his wife Sophie were assassinated by Gavrilo Princip, a Serbian, on the 28th June 1914. This appeared to be a catalyst to the war.

Archduke Franz Ferdinand was the replacement to the Austrian throne. The Austrian ? Hungarians retaliated against the Serbian people. Because of an alliance that Germany had with Austro-Hungary they said they would survive them in a war. Russia was in alliance with Serbia and they said they would post them in a war. Italy had an alliance with Germany and Austria-Hungary and this was called the triple alliance. Germany said they would prevail war on Russia if they did non back down. France had an alliance with Russia, and they agree to back them in a war - this was called a bivalent entente. Then later when Britain joined in it became the triple entente.

Britain did non join in with the war straight away this was part because it only had verbal alliances and also they were trying to negotiate with the warring countries and act as mediators. Finally when Germany declared war on France and invaded through Belgium, Britain declared war on Germany. Belgium was a achromatic country and Britain came to its aid (like protecting the underdogs). Italy changed sides and joined the Russian, France and Britain side.

Although originally the alliances were perform up as protection the alliances also caused the nations to war not just the two countries that were in disagreement. The details of the alliances were kept dark and have only now been released. Just slaming a country was in alliance was enough, the details were not needed. Feelings were in truth important such as the Austria Hungary alliance with Germany ?this united the countries and they entangle secure. The Marxist historian Joll believed that the secrecy and diplomats caused the breakdown of the alliances and ultimately the war.

Ideologies were really important. It was as important what people thought had happened as what had very happened. Weltpolitik was a way of thinking. It means ?attitude of mind?I.Giess believed that the Kaiser had the faultless attitude and personality for Welpolitik, ?bore the personal stamp of the Kaiser?. The Kaiser was paranoid and a meglomanic. Panic and fear also played an important part to Ideologies. Propaganda was rife and people believe what they were told and what they read and saw. The force played a major part in this. There was a rise generally in media culture. There was corporation production of pamphlets and manipulation of data. Posters were put up and freedom of the squeeze meant they could print what they wanted. Letters were censored before they could be displace home so that families back home didn?t know how bad it was in the war. Attitudes were very important and what people thought.

The maritime race is another example of this. Germany had the best land soldiers ? and the second best navy. Britain?s was the best. Germany however wanted to be the best and it concentrated its efforts into making its navy the best. They could only forge what Britain had in the navy and Admiral Von Turpitz told Germany they must at to the lowest degree double the number they thought that Britain had. The Germans had U-boats and submarines but they wanted more than and began to build dreadnoughts like the British had already.

Sir Edward Grey realised that Britain had to hold on on building ships and military armaments even though as he said ?he didn?t agree in spending revenues on naval and military preparation to get the better of each other?. He also said ?we must be prepared to defend our national existence?.

Britain had the man-power, companionship and innovators they also had the area and facilities to build the ships. Britain was responsible for policing colonies and trade routes. They defended the coastlines and oblige blockades. England and France had a naval agreement that they maintained the security of the side channel and France the Mediterranean.

BibliographyThe Origins for World War One, 1871-1914by Joachim RemakThe Origins of the First World War (Origins Of Modern Wars) by James Joll and Gordon Martel

If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.